There is no doubt that Narendra Modi was elected as the prime minister of india in 2014 and made multiple & strong decisions for the development of the country, he is famous for making hard decisions for the growth and development of the nation, no matter who is opposing. From 2014 to the present Indian diplomacy driven under PM Narendra Modi is on the peek and india is growing continuously towards becoming the new face of world diplomacy and the new production house of the world manufacturing industry under make in india initiatives by the Modi Led Govt. Despite many social, diplomatic, and financial attacks on india by the narrow-minded and corrupt institutions and individuals like George Soros.
Under the supervision of the Prime Minister of India Shri. Narendra Modi of the BJP Party the One Nation One Election (ONOE) system is a proposal to hold simultaneous elections for all national and state legislatures in India. This would mean that all Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, Assembly, and Vidhan Parishad elections would be held in the same year, instead of the current system where they are held at different times.
There are several arguments in favor of the ONOE system. One argument is that it would save money and resources. Currently, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has to conduct elections every few months, which is a costly and time-consuming process. The ONOE system would allow the ECI to focus its resources on a single election, which would save money and time.
Another argument in favor of the ONOE system is that it would increase voter turnout. When elections are held frequently, people tend to get tired of voting and may not turn out to vote. The ONOE system would mean that people would only have to vote once every few years, which could increase voter turnout.
Finally, the ONOE system could help to improve political stability. When elections are held frequently, there is a risk of political instability, as governments can change hands more often. The ONOE system would mean that governments would have a longer time to implement their policies, which could help to improve political stability.
However, there are also some arguments against the ONOE system. One argument is that it would be difficult to implement. The ONOE system would require a constitutional amendment, and it would also require the cooperation of all state governments. It is not clear that all of these hurdles could be overcome.
Another argument against the ONOE system is that it would not be fair to all states. Some states have more elections than others, and the ONOE system would mean that these states would have to wait longer between elections. This could lead to resentment among the people of these states.
Finally, the ONOE system could lead to a concentration of power in the hands of the central government. The central government would have more control over the political process, which could undermine the power of state governments.
Overall, there are both pros and cons to the ONOE system. It is a complex issue with no easy answers. More research and debate are needed to determine whether the ONOE system is the best way to improve the electoral process in India.
In addition to the arguments mentioned above, there are a few other things to consider about the ONOE system. One is the cost of holding simultaneous elections. The ECI estimates that it would cost an additional amount to hold simultaneous elections. This is a significant amount of money, and it is not clear where it would come from.
Another issue is the question of whether the ONOE system would be fair to all states. As mentioned above, some states have more elections than others. The ONOE system would mean that these states would have to wait longer between elections. This could lead to resentment among the people of these states.
Finally, there is the question of whether the ONOE system would be feasible. The ECI has said that it would need at least two years to prepare for simultaneous elections. This is a long time, and it is not clear that all of the necessary preparations could be made in such a short period of time.
Overall, the ONOE system is a complex issue with no easy answers but it is clear that it will help to dedicate the Govt to more focus on work for country Growth instead of busy in election campaigns every year and also saves taxpayers money. There are both pros and cons to the system, and it is important to weigh all of the factors involved before making a decision about whether or not to implement it.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/tea-with-life/as-india-preps-for-one-nation-one-election-bill-what-are-the-potential-benefits-and-drawbacks/
https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/one-nation-one-election-is-possible-but-ex-chief-election-commissioner-explains-roadmap-to-implement-it-11693553860843.html
Leave feedback about this